What is really the deal with the Congressional Super Committee and are they actually going to come up with a deficit reduction plan that both sides of the aisle can agree upon?
The answer: no one knows.
The deadline for the Joint Select Committee on Deficit Reduction – aka the Super Committee – is today and it seems they are years away from identifying a ten-year plan that would reduce the federal deficit by at least $1.2 trillion. Senate Democrats on the Super Committee have proposed a plan that would reduce the federal deficit by up to $3 trillion by cutting critical safety net programs like Medicaid and Medicare but also raising new revenues from tax code changes.
However, the proposal was a no-go as soon as the Republican Super Committee members saw it because of the tax changes.
If the super committee fails to reach an agreement by midnight tonight, sequestration takes place. Sequestration would trigger across the board cuts for all discretionary programs while preserving mandatory programs. (Don’t know the difference between discretionary and mandatory programs? Learn more at the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities.) The across-the-board cuts would begin January 1, 2013. If the Super Committee successfully votes out a plan by tonight, the plan then goes to Congress. The plan must be voted on by December 23, 2011; amendments and filibustering are not allowed and only a simple majority is needed.
So why does all this matter to children and families in Michigan? The Super Committee has full jurisdiction to make any changes to discretionary and mandatory programs to reduce the deficit. This means that critical entitlement programs could be at risk such as Medicaid, the Children’s Health Insurance Program, SNAP (aka food stamps), free- and reduced-lunch, child care, etc. But if the Super Committee fails to reach an agreement and sequestration takes place, then education programs such as Title I funding and Head Start, health programs such as the Maternal and Child Health Block Grant and community health centers, workforce development programs and the like would be decimated. Either way, it could be bad for kids. Thus, a smart deficit reduction plan would address needed revenues and prioritizes sensible and effective investments in low-income children and families.
Here’s the catch. If the Super Committee doesn’t identify a plan triggering sequestration, Congress has an entire year to “fix” the problem. Congress could pass a law that would reverse sequestration and revert to traditional methods of determining the federal budget rather than succumbing to the across-the-board cuts.
So in the end, what does this all really mean for children and kids? I still don’t really know but I’m keeping my eyes on it and telling Representatives Camp and Upton – Michigan’s two Congressmen who sit on the 12-member Super Committee – that federal dollars are important for Michigan children and families. Learn more on Michigan’s Children’s federal budget page.